Peugeot 308 2017 vs Skoda Rapid 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 308 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 308 engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Thanks to more power Peugeot 308 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Peugeot 308 2017 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ... More about Peugeot 308 2017 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Peugeot 308 is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1228 litres | 1490 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 308 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Peugeot 308 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`770 kg | 1`659 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`150 kg | 1`204 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 620 kg | 455 kg | |
| Peugeot 308 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem more than Skoda Rapid. Therefore, Peugeot 308 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Rapid has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 308 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Rapid quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 308 has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |