Peugeot 308 2017 vs Skoda Rapid 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Peugeot 308 engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Despite the higher power, Peugeot 308 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 308 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 308 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 308 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Peugeot 308 2017 1.2 engine: Because the timing belt is placed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to axial play in the crankshaft. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Peugeot 308 is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1228 litres | no data | |
| Peugeot 308 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 308 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Peugeot 308 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`625 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Rapid has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 308 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Rapid quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 308 has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |