Peugeot 308 2013 vs Skoda Rapid 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 308 engine produces 1 HP less power than Skoda Rapid, but torque is 20 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 308 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 4.1 | |
|
The Peugeot 308 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 308 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that by driving the Peugeot 308 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1430 km in combined cycle | 1340 km in combined cycle | |
| 1600 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 308 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Peugeot 308 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Peugeot 308 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Peugeot 308 is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
817 litres | 1490 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 308 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Peugeot 308 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`780 kg | 1`750 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`160 kg | 1`295 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 620 kg | 455 kg | |
| Peugeot 308 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem more than Skoda Rapid. Therefore, Peugeot 308 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Rapid has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 308 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Rapid quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 308 has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |