Peugeot 308 2007 vs Fiat Bravo 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Peugeot 308 engine produces 10 HP less power than Fiat Bravo, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Fiat Bravo. Despite less power, Peugeot 308 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.3 | |
|
The Peugeot 308 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 308 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that by driving the Peugeot 308 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| Peugeot 308 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen C3, Peugeot 407, Citroen Xsara Picasso | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 308 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 308 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 308 is 6 cm shorter than the Fiat Bravo, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1201 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage space. Peugeot 308 has 52 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 308 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Fiat Bravo, which means Peugeot 308 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Peugeot 308 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Bravo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Peugeot 308, so Peugeot 308 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 308 has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |