Peugeot 308 2007 vs Volvo C30 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo C30 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 308 engine produces 19 HP less power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Volvo C30. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 308 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1330 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1570 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 308 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen Berlingo | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S40, Volvo V50 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Peugeot 308 is larger. Peugeot 308 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo C30, 4 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 308 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1201 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 308 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 308 has 97 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 308 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo C30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`780 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volvo C30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 308 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volvo C30, so Volvo C30 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 308 has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |