Peugeot 308 2017 vs Skoda Rapid 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 - 250 HP | 90 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 - 370 NM | 160 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 - 11.5 seconds | 8.9 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 6.5 | 4.0 - 4.8 | |
|
Peugeot 308 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Rapid. On average, Peugeot 308 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Peugeot 308 is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1228 litres | no data | |
| Peugeot 308 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 308 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`800 | ~ 1`684 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 308 has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |