Peugeot 308 2013 vs Volvo V40 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 270 HP | 115 - 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 400 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 - 15.2 seconds | 6.3 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 6.5 | 3.2 - 9.0 | |
|
Peugeot 308 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Peugeot 308 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Peugeot 308 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 308 is 12 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 308 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
855 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 308 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 308 has 135 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 308 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Peugeot 308 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`796 | ~ 1`976 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V40 scores higher in safety tests, butPeugeot 308 is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V40 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 308 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |