Peugeot 307 2002 vs Volkswagen Polo 2006

 
Peugeot 307
2002 - 2005
Volkswagen Polo
2006 - 2009
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 110 HP105 HP
Torque: 147 NM153 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.4 seconds11.3 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Peugeot 307 engine produces 5 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, but torque is 6 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Despite the higher power, Peugeot 307 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.37.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.8 l/100km7.6 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Peugeot 307 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 307 could require 135 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 307 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle600 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway760 km on highway
680 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption
Peugeot 307 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m3.92 m
Width: 1.76 m1.65 m
Height: 1.51 m1.47 m
Peugeot 307 is larger.
Peugeot 307 is 50 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 11 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 307 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 340 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1540 litres1030 litres
Peugeot 307 has more luggage capacity.
Peugeot 307 has 70 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 307 (by 510 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 307 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Peugeot 307 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9591`650
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 307, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10002400
Rating in user reviews: 6.9/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 307 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv