Peugeot 307 2002 vs Peugeot 206 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Peugeot 307 and Peugeot 206 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Peugeot 307 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 307 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 307 could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 307 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 307 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Peugeot 307 is larger. Peugeot 307 is 39 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 11 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 307 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 313 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1540 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 307 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 307 has 27 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 307 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Peugeot 307 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`959 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Peugeot 307 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 206, so Peugeot 307 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 307 has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |