Peugeot 307 2002 vs Ford Focus 2001
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Peugeot 307 engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Ford Focus. Despite the higher power, Peugeot 307 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 307 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 307 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 307 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 307 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 307 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 307 2002 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 307 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Peugeot 307 is larger. Peugeot 307 is 4 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 6 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 307 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1540 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Focus has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Peugeot 307 has 150 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus. This could mean that the Peugeot 307 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 307 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford Focus. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`959 | 1`615 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Ford Focus has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 307 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford Focus, so Ford Focus quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.9/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 307 has
|
Ford Focus has
| |