Peugeot 307 2002 vs Peugeot 206 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
| Peugeot 307 and Peugeot 206 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Peugeot 307 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 307 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 307 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 307 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Peugeot 307 is larger. Peugeot 307 is 39 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 11 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 307 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 313 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1540 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 307 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Peugeot 307 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Peugeot 206 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 307, so Peugeot 206 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 307 has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |