Peugeot 307 2002 vs Peugeot 307 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 307 2005 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 307 2002 engine produces 35 HP less power than Peugeot 307 2005, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Peugeot 307 2005. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 307 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 307 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 307 2002 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307 2005, which means that by driving the Peugeot 307 2002 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 307 2002 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307 2005. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 307 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen Berlingo | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Peugeot 206 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 307 2005 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 307 2005 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 307 2002 is 1 cm shorter than the Peugeot 307 2005, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 307 2002 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1540 litres | 2211 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Peugeot 307 2005 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 307 2002 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Peugeot 307 2005, so Peugeot 307 2005 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 307 has
|
Peugeot 307 has
| |