Peugeot 307 2005 vs Citroen C4 2008
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 147 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Citroen C4 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 307 engine produces 40 HP less power than Citroen C4, whereas torque is 93 NM less than Citroen C4. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 307 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
The Citroen C4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 307 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 307 could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 307 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
950 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
740 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen C4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | Used also on Peugeot 308 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 307 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Peugeot 307 2005 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 307 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.43 m | 4.27 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.46 m | |
Peugeot 307 is 16 cm longer than the Citroen C4, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 307 is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 320 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2211 litres | 1023 litres | |
Peugeot 307 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 307 has 200 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 307 (by 1188 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 307 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C4. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`763 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Peugeot 307 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen C4, so Peugeot 307 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 307 has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |