Peugeot 307 2005 vs Volvo V50 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 307 engine produces 26 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 307 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 307 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 307 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that by driving the Peugeot 307 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 307 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 307 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Peugeot 307 is smaller, but higher. Peugeot 307 is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 307 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2211 litres | 1307 litres | |
|
Peugeot 307 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo V50 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 307 (by 904 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 307 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V50, which means Peugeot 307 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 1`850 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`483 kg | 1`456 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 517 kg | 394 kg | |
| Peugeot 307 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem more than Volvo V50. Therefore, Peugeot 307 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo V50 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 307 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo V50, so Volvo V50 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 307 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |