Peugeot 306 1999 vs Peugeot 206 2002
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Peugeot 306 engine produces 2 HP more power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Peugeot 206. Despite the higher power, Peugeot 306 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 306 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 306 could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 306 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen Xantia | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 206 2002 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 206 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Peugeot 306 is larger, but lower. Peugeot 306 is 45 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 4 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 306 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 992 litres | |
|
Peugeot 306 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 306 has 253 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 306 is 1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Peugeot 306 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Peugeot 206 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 306 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Peugeot 206, so Peugeot 206 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 306 has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |