Peugeot 306 1999 vs Peugeot 206 2002
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 306 engine produces 20 HP less power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Peugeot 206. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 306 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.1 | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 306 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 306 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen Xsara Picasso, Peugeot 106 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 206 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 206 2002 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 206 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Peugeot 306 is larger, but lower. Peugeot 306 is 45 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 4 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 306 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 992 litres | |
|
Peugeot 306 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 306 has 253 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 306 is 1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Peugeot 306 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Peugeot 206 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 306 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Peugeot 206, so Peugeot 206 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 306 has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |