Peugeot 306 1999 vs Suzuki Baleno 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 111 NM | 103 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Baleno is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 306 engine produces 10 HP less power than Suzuki Baleno, but torque is 8 NM more than Suzuki Baleno. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 306 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 306 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Peugeot 306 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 306 could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 306 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 306 is 5 cm longer than the Suzuki Baleno, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 306 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 306 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Baleno, which means Peugeot 306 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Suzuki Baleno has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 306 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Suzuki Baleno, so Suzuki Baleno quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 306 has
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |