Peugeot 306 1999 vs Audi A3 2004
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 205 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 306 engine produces 50 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Audi A3. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 306 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
The Peugeot 306 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 306 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Peugeot 306 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 306 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
1390 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
1030 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A4 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 306 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.29 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
Peugeot 306 is 5 cm longer than the Audi A3, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 306 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 370 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1512 litres | 1120 litres | |
Peugeot 306 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 306 has 70 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 306 (by 392 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 306 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Audi A3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`940 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | high | |
Audi A3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 306 has serious deffects in 590 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 306 has
|
Audi A3 has
| |