Peugeot 306 1999 vs Audi A3 2004

 
Peugeot 306
1999 - 2002
Audi A3
2004 - 2008
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP140 HP
Torque: 205 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds9.7 seconds
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving.
Peugeot 306 engine produces 50 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Audi A3. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 306 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.25.5
Real fuel consumption: 5.8 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Peugeot 306 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Peugeot 306 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Peugeot 306 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 306 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1390 km on highway1190 km on highway
1030 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption
Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Engine production duration: 7 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A4
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 306 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.34 m4.29 m
Width: 1.68 m1.76 m
Height: 1.41 m1.42 m
Peugeot 306 is 5 cm longer than the Audi A3, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 306 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 440 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1512 litres1120 litres
Peugeot 306 has more luggage capacity.
Peugeot 306 has 70 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 306 (by 392 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 306 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6551`940
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

high
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 306 has serious deffects in 590 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8003400
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 306 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv