Peugeot 306 1999 vs Peugeot 106 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 58 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 18.5 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 306 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 306 engine produces 32 HP more power than Peugeot 106, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Peugeot 106. Thanks to more power Peugeot 306 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 106 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Peugeot 306 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106, which means that by driving the Peugeot 306 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 306 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 306 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 306 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Peugeot 306 is larger, but slightly lower. Peugeot 306 is 35 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 9 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 306 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
640 litres | 953 litres | |
| Peugeot 306 has 125 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 106. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 106 (by 313 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 306 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Peugeot 106. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`585 | 1`375 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Peugeot 306 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 106, so Peugeot 306 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 306 has
|
| |