Peugeot 306 2001 vs Skoda Fabia 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 306 engine produces 7 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 306 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Fabia can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Fabia version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Peugeot 306 2001 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 306 2001 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Peugeot 306 is larger, but lower. Peugeot 306 is 4 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 306 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1146 litres | 1163 litres | |
| Peugeot 306 has 40 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 17 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 306 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Peugeot 306 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`585 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 306 has serious deffects in 390 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 306 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |