Peugeot 306 1999 vs Peugeot 106 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 118 HP | |
Torque: | 135 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
Peugeot 106 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 306 engine produces 28 HP less power than Peugeot 106, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Peugeot 106. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 306 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.2 | |
The Peugeot 306 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 306 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106, which means that by driving the Peugeot 306 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.03 m | 3.68 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.59 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.38 m | |
Peugeot 306 is larger, but slightly lower. Peugeot 306 is 35 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 9 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 306 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 215 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 953 litres | |
Peugeot 306 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 306 has 125 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 106. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`385 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
Peugeot 306 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 106, so Peugeot 306 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 306 has
|
Peugeot 106 has
| |