Peugeot 306 1999 vs Volkswagen Polo 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 112 HP | 60 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 111 - 205 NM | 116 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 17.9 seconds | 11.1 - 17.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.4 | 5.2 - 8.6 | |
|
On average, the Peugeot 306 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Volkswagen Polo. On average, Peugeot 306 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Peugeot 306 is larger, but lower. Peugeot 306 is 20 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 306 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1512 litres | 1250 litres | |
|
Peugeot 306 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 306 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 306 (by 262 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`615 | ~ 1`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 306 has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |