Peugeot 306 1999 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 112 HP | 71 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 111 - 205 NM | 120 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 17.9 seconds | 8.8 - 16 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.4 | 5.3 - 7.7 | |
|
Peugeot 306 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara. On average, a Peugeot 306 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Citroen Xsara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 306 is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 306 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1512 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 306 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`615 | ~ 1`086 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |