Peugeot 306 1999 vs Citroen Xsara 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 70 - 135 HP | 68 - 135 HP | |
Torque: | 111 - 205 NM | 112 - 205 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 17.2 seconds | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.1 | 5.2 - 9.1 | |
Peugeot 306 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara. On average, Peugeot 306 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.03 m | 4.17 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.40 m | |
Peugeot 306 is smaller. Peugeot 306 is 14 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 306 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1146 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 306 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`519 | ~ 1`100 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 306 has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |