Peugeot 301 2017 vs Renault Megane 2013
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 301 engine produces 34 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 72 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 301 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.3 | |
|
The Peugeot 301 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 301 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Peugeot 301 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 142 mm (5.6 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Peugeot 301 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Peugeot 301 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Peugeot 301 is 14 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 372 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | 1162 litres | |
|
Peugeot 301 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 301 has 134 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 301 (by 170 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`470 | 1`787 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 301 has
|
Renault Megane has
| |