Peugeot 301 2013 vs Volkswagen Polo 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 301 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 301 engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, but torque is 3 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Peugeot 301 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.0 | |
|
The Peugeot 301 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 301 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Peugeot 301 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Peugeot 301 is larger. Peugeot 301 is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 301 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 301 has 46 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`524 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 301 has
|
| |