Peugeot 301 2013 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 210 HP | |
Torque: | 150 NM | n/a NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
Volkswagen Passat CC is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 301 engine produces 95 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 301 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.8 | |
The Peugeot 301 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 301 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that by driving the Peugeot 301 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
940 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | no data | |
Width: | 1.75 m | no data | |
Height: | 1.47 m | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 532 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | no data | |
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage space. Peugeot 301 has 26 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`524 | 1`990 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | 15 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 301 has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |