Peugeot 301 2013 vs Dacia Logan 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 104 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 301 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 301 engine produces 40 HP more power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 46 NM more than Dacia Logan. Thanks to more power Peugeot 301 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.6 | |
|
The Peugeot 301 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 301 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that by driving the Peugeot 301 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 301 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Citroen C4, Citroen C-Elysee, Peugeot 408 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 301 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Peugeot 301 is larger, but lower. Peugeot 301 is 10 cm longer than the Dacia Logan, 2 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 301 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | 1250 litres | |
| Peugeot 301 has 4 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Logan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 301 (by 82 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`524 | 1`562 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 301 has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |