Peugeot 301 2017 vs Renault Megane 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Peugeot 301
2017 -
Renault Megane
2012 - 2016
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.61.2 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 82 - 115 HP90 - 220 HP
Torque: 118 - 254 NM148 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 - 12.9 seconds7.6 - 12.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.5 - 6.63.4 - 7.7
Peugeot 301 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. On average, Peugeot 301 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 142 mm (5.6 inches)120 mm (4.7 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Peugeot 301 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.45 m4.30 m
Width: 1.75 m1.81 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Peugeot 301 is 14 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 506 litres405 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1332 litres1162 litres
Peugeot 301 has more luggage capacity.
Peugeot 301 has 101 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 301 (by 170 litres).
Turning diameter: no data11 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`543~ 1`814
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data5000
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 301 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv