Peugeot 301 2017 vs Audi A3 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Peugeot 301
2017 -
Audi A3
2016 - 2020
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Peugeot 301 is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi A3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.2 - 1.61.0 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 82 - 115 HP110 - 190 HP
Torque: 118 - 254 NM200 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 - 12.9 seconds6.2 - 10.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.5 - 6.65.0 - 5.6
Peugeot 301 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.45 m4.46 m
Width: 1.75 m1.80 m
Height: 1.47 m1.42 m
Peugeot 301 is smaller, but higher.
Peugeot 301 is 1 cm shorter than the Audi A3, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 301 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 506 litres425 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1332 litres880 litres
Peugeot 301 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 301 has 81 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3. The Audi A3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 301 (by 452 litres).
Turning diameter: no data11 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`543~ 1`842
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): no data18 400
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 301 has
  • roomier boot
Audi A3 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv