Peugeot 301 2013 vs Suzuki Splash 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Peugeot 301
2013 - 2016
Suzuki Splash
2008 - 2012
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.61.0 - 1.2

Performance

Power: 72 - 115 HP65 - 94 HP
Torque: 110 - 230 NM90 - 190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 - 14.2 seconds12 - 14.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.3 - 7.35.0 - 5.9
Peugeot 301 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Splash.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.44 m3.72 m
Width: 1.75 m1.68 m
Height: 1.47 m1.59 m
Peugeot 301 is larger, but lower.
Peugeot 301 is 73 cm longer than the Suzuki Splash, 7 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 301 is 12 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 506 litres178 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1332 litres1050 litres
Peugeot 301 has more luggage capacity.
Peugeot 301 has 328 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Splash. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 301 (by 282 litres).
Turning diameter: no data9.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`505~ 1`493
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 4000no data
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 301 has
  • roomier boot
Suzuki Splash has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv