Peugeot 301 2013 vs Suzuki Splash 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 72 - 115 HP | 65 - 94 HP | |
Torque: | 110 - 230 NM | 90 - 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 14.2 seconds | 12 - 14.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.3 | 5.0 - 5.9 | |
Peugeot 301 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Splash. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 3.72 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.59 m | |
Peugeot 301 is larger, but lower. Peugeot 301 is 73 cm longer than the Suzuki Splash, 7 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 301 is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 178 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | 1050 litres | |
Peugeot 301 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 301 has 328 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Splash. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 301 (by 282 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`505 | ~ 1`493 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 301 has
|
Suzuki Splash has
| |