Peugeot 301 2013 vs Peugeot 408 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 - 115 HP | 110 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 230 NM | 110 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 14.2 seconds | 9.6 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.3 | 4.9 - 9.9 | |
|
Peugeot 301 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 408. On average, Peugeot 301 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 408. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Peugeot 301 is smaller. Peugeot 301 is 28 cm shorter than the Peugeot 408, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 301 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 301 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 301 has 51 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 408. The Peugeot 408 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`505 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 301 has
|
| |