Peugeot 301 2013 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 - 115 HP | 70 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 230 NM | 115 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 14.2 seconds | 11.3 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.3 | 3.7 - 7.1 | |
|
Peugeot 301 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Aveo. On average, Peugeot 301 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Peugeot 301 is larger, but lower. Peugeot 301 is 4 cm longer than the Chevrolet Aveo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 301 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 502 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | 698 litres | |
| Peugeot 301 has 4 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 301 (by 634 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`505 | ~ 1`602 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |