Peugeot 3008 2009 vs Peugeot 4007 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 4007 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 3008 engine produces 7 HP more power than Peugeot 4007, but torque is 40 NM less than Peugeot 4007. Despite the higher power, Peugeot 3008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.2 | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 3008 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 4007, which means that by driving the Peugeot 3008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C5, Peugeot 508, Citroen DS4 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Citroen C-Crosser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.72 m | |
| Peugeot 3008 is 27 cm shorter than the Peugeot 4007, 3 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 3008 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1241 litres | 1686 litres | |
|
Peugeot 4007 has more luggage space. Peugeot 3008 has 78 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 4007. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 4007 (by 445 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 3008 is 1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 4007, which means Peugeot 3008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Peugeot 4007 has
| |