Peugeot 3008 2009 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 3008 engine produces 30 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 3008 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 3008 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Peugeot 3008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 3008 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 3008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Peugeot 3008 is 26 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 3008 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1241 litres | 955 litres | |
| Peugeot 3008 has 124 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 3008 (by 286 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 3008 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Peugeot 3008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |