Peugeot 3008 2009 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2010
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Peugeot 3008 and Citroen C4 Picasso have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Peugeot 3008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Peugeot 3008 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 3008 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 3008 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Citroen C5, Peugeot 3008, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Peugeot 3008 is 21 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 3008 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1241 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Peugeot 3008 has 68 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 3008 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`015 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |