Peugeot 3008 2009 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 3008 engine produces 40 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 3008 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 3008 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Peugeot 3008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 3008 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 3008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
| Peugeot 3008 is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 7 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 3008 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1604 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 3008 has 13 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 3008 (by 385 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 3008 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Peugeot 3008 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Peugeot 3008 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |