Peugeot 3008 2009 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 3008 engine produces 40 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 3008 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| 960 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 3008 2009 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Peugeot 3008 2009 1.6 engine Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Peugeot 3008 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 3008 is 9 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 3008 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1604 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Peugeot 3008 has 118 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 3008 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. The Peugeot 3008 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |