Peugeot 3008 2009 vs Jeep Compass 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Jeep Compass is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 3008 engine produces 30 HP less power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Jeep Compass. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 3008 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.5 | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 3008 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the Peugeot 3008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Compass 2006: It has Freedom Drive I - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally the car is in front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The system is primarily designed for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 3008 2009 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Peugeot 3008 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Peugeot 3008 is 14 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 334 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1604 litres | 1277 litres | |
|
Peugeot 3008 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 3008 has 98 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. The Jeep Compass may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 3008 (by 327 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 3008 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |