Peugeot 3008 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Peugeot 3008 engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo XC60. Despite less power, Peugeot 3008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 3008 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Peugeot 3008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 3008 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Peugeot 3008 is smaller. Peugeot 3008 is 27 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 3008 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1241 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Peugeot 3008 has 63 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 214 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 3008 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Peugeot 3008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |