Peugeot 3008 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 3008 engine produces 88 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 3008 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 8.0 | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 3008 consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Peugeot 3008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 1 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 3008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Peugeot 3008 is smaller. Peugeot 3008 is 27 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 3008 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1241 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Peugeot 3008 has 63 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 214 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |