Peugeot 3008 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 3008 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 3008 engine produces 6 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mazda CX-5. Thanks to more power Peugeot 3008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.2 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 3008 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 3008 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Peugeot 3008 is smaller. Peugeot 3008 is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 3008 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1241 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Peugeot 3008 has 31 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 379 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 3008 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 1`945 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |