Peugeot 3008 2024 vs Mazda CX-3 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Peugeot 3008) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mazda CX-3) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 3008 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 3008 engine produces 31 HP more power than Mazda CX-3, but torque is 40 NM less than Mazda CX-3. Thanks to more power Peugeot 3008 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.2 | |
|
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 3008 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 3008 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 2014: AWD system delivers 98 percent of power to the front wheels under normal conditions, and up to 50 percent of torque can be shifted to the rear wheels in the event of wheel slip. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Peugeot 3008 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Peugeot 3008 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Peugeot 3008 is larger. Peugeot 3008 is 27 cm longer than the Mazda CX-3, 13 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 3008 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1480 litres | 1260 litres | |
|
Peugeot 3008 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 3008 has 170 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 3008 (by 220 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`080 kg | 1`815 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`648 kg | 1`295 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 432 kg | 520 kg | |
| Peugeot 3008 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than Mazda CX-3. Therefore, Mazda CX-3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 30 200 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |