Peugeot 3008 2024 vs Mazda CX-3 2015
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Hybrid | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Peugeot 3008) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Mazda CX-3), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 3008 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 3008 engine produces 45 HP more power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mazda CX-3. Thanks to more power Peugeot 3008 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 0.9 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 11.10 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 6110 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 2014: AWD system delivers 98 percent of power to the front wheels under normal conditions, and up to 50 percent of torque can be shifted to the rear wheels in the event of wheel slip. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Peugeot 3008 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Peugeot 3008 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Peugeot 3008 is larger. Peugeot 3008 is 27 cm longer than the Mazda CX-3, 13 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 3008 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1480 litres | 1260 litres | |
|
Peugeot 3008 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 3008 has 170 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 3008 (by 220 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`420 kg | 1`815 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`905 kg | 1`295 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 515 kg | 520 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 30 200 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |