Peugeot 3008 2017 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Peugeot 3008) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda CX-5) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 3008 engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, but torque is 90 NM more than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 3008 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 6.2 | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 3008 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Peugeot 3008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1430 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.67 m | |
| Peugeot 3008 is 9 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 3008 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1482 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 3008 has 57 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 138 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 3008 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Peugeot 3008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |