Peugeot 3008 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2009

 
Peugeot 3008
2013 - 2016
Volvo XC60
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Diesel2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 130 HP203 HP
Torque: 300 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.4 seconds8.9 seconds
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving.
Peugeot 3008 engine produces 73 HP less power than Volvo XC60, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 3008 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.28.5
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Peugeot 3008 consumes 4.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Peugeot 3008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 645 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1420 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
1500 km on highway1010 km on highway
Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.63 m
Width: 1.91 m1.89 m
Height: 1.64 m1.71 m
Peugeot 3008 is 27 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 2 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 3008 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 432 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1241 litres1455 litres
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space.
Peugeot 3008 has 63 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 214 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 3008 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Peugeot 3008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0402`500
Safety:
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 84009400
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 3008 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo XC60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv