Peugeot 3008 2013 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 3008 engine produces 20 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 3008 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 6.5 | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 3008 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Peugeot 3008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1420 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 3008 is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 2 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 3008 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1241 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Peugeot 3008 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 3008 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`040 kg | 2`350 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`470 kg | 1`715 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 570 kg | 635 kg | |
| Peugeot 3008 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |