Peugeot 3008 2016 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Peugeot 3008 and Renault Kadjar have the same engine power, but Peugeot 3008 torque is 25 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Peugeot 3008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.6 | |
| Peugeot 3008 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that by driving the Peugeot 3008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 219 mm (8.6 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Peugeot 3008 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Peugeot 3008 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 3008 and Renault Kadjar are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1482 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Peugeot 3008 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 3008 has 48 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 3008 (by 4 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 1`853 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |