Peugeot 3008 2013 vs Peugeot 3008 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 200 HP | 110 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 340 NM | 160 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 12.6 seconds | 8.9 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 7.7 | 4.9 - 7.7 | |
|
Peugeot 3008 2013 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 3008 2009. On average, Peugeot 3008 2013 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008 2009. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 3008 2013 is 4 cm longer than the Peugeot 3008 2009, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 512 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1241 litres | 1604 litres | |
|
Peugeot 3008 2009 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Peugeot 3008 2013 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 3008 2009 (by 363 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`044 kg | ~ 2`040 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`445 kg | ~ 1`492 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 599 kg | ~ 548 kg | |
| Peugeot 3008 2013 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Peugeot 3008 2009. Therefore, Peugeot 3008 2013 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Peugeot 3008 2009 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Peugeot 3008 has
| |