Peugeot 208 2015 vs Renault Clio 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 208 HP | 200 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
Peugeot 208 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 208 engine produces 8 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Peugeot 208 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.3 | |
The Peugeot 208 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 208 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Peugeot 208 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
1110 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 208 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Megane, Renault Espace | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Peugeot 208 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.96 m | 4.09 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
Peugeot 208 is 13 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 10 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 208 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 300 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1076 litres | no data | |
Peugeot 208 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`714 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Peugeot 208 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Peugeot 208, so Peugeot 208 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 6800 | 9400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 208 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |